Issue the following command in the shell: We've just released v2.33 of the Azure Provider, which includes a workaround for this issue. @jason-johnson Below i share working configuration with the deprecated policy block. Doing so will cause a conflict of Route configurations and will overwrite Routes. terraform-azurerm-compute. That's all. This is where the Azure API issue Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 becomes a problem and forces the inline settings to be passed. This Terraform module deploys Virtual Machines in Azure with the following characteristics: Terraform will automatically remove the OS Disk by default - this behaviour can be configured using the features setting within the Provider block. My final educated guess is that azurerm_sql_server resource calls the Azure API in a deprecated way and a breaking change removing the compatibility has been made and released to the West EU datacenter.. @marianbendik Thanks. Sign in Having spoken with Azure Support, it appears that the fix for this in the Azure API has been rolled out to the West Europe region - as such older versions of the Azure Provider should now be available to use in that region. If you let a terraform apply fail as above and then look at the source config using the CLI, you'll see that repoUrl has become set to null. Contributor role itself was not enough to set up the code repository for Azure Data Factory using Terraform azurerm. Which you also can't round trip into the CLI. The Terraform provider is attempting to run a command to send updates to the source config section as above (not sure why it does, since nothing has changed). The key is optional in the new azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy resource. I'm seeing the same. This guide is intended to help with that process. Already on GitHub? GitHub repo. I'm having same error in westeurope, should this be reopened @tombuildsstuff? to your account. Well this won't work for us, since we are using TF Enterprise and it's not that easy to edit the state file :(. Published 21 days ago. Adding the block for the databases seems to have fixed the issue. It looks like issue is back. Please vote on this issue by adding a reaction to the original issue to help … By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and I needed to "terraform untaint" at least twice for the deployment to work. Do we know, if we have a possible ETA, targeted for eastus region ? Whilst it's unfortunate that the Service Team have opted to roll the breaking change out to all regions, before deploying the bug fix - as opposed to rolling back (which means that it could be another 1-2 weeks until older versions of the Azure Provider work) - based on the Acceptance Tests, we believe this should fix this issue for users who can upgrade to the latest version of the Azure Provider. During the initialization process, Terraform scans the current directory for Terraform configuration files (*.tf) and downloads the recognized plugins that are required to execute the configuration. Sign in an unintended change just to get the deployment working again? 1. https://MyAccount.blob.core.windows.net). @asinitson you are right that azure backend service will fall back to allowed values, but which could cause fields diff in terraform and lead to annoying message. I wonder whether this as well works or not. @roshanp85 the last two releases of the Azure Provider have included a fix for this, so you can upgrade and this'll be available in EastUS: https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#2330-october-22-2020. Support for app function keys from the azurerm_function_app without relying on azurerm_function_app_host_keys data source #9854 opened Dec 14, 2020 by sonic1981 Azure marketplace non image agreements eg apps terraform-azurerm-vnet. I am experiencing this issue in North and West Europe with the following versions of Terraform core and the provider. The goal of this guide is to cover the most common upgrade concerns and issues that would benefit from more explanation and background. If you are using azurerm_template_deployment terraform resource and getting following errors: ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘array’ ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘object’ ‘[parameter]’ expected type ‘string’, got unconvertible type ‘int’ etc. The bug here was first noticed on Terraform’s AzureRM release 0.24.0. We've just released v2.33 of the Azure Provider, which includes a workaround for this issue. Then I just repeat the workaround - edit the file again, delete all the "status": "tainted" lines (we have 1 server, but several databases) and save it back. Already on GitHub? If the inline settings are not passed we get the same error as the original post: Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue. Just needed to make it twice, because after SQL Server itself was OK, the same error happened again on the databases (azurerm_sql_database). I can provide more details if needed. azurerm_resource_group.main: Creating... azurerm_storage_account.blob_storage: Creating... azurerm_storage_container.blob_container: … Copy and paste into your Terraform configuration, insert the variables, and run terraform init : module "keyvault-acmebot" { source = "shibayan/keyvault-acmebot/azurerm" version = "1.0.0" # insert the 13 required variables here } It doesn't work on WestEurope and azurerm v2.32.0, Error issuing create/update request for SQL Server "xxx-sqlserver" Blob Auditing Policies(Resource Group "xxx"): sql.ExtendedServerBlobAuditingPoliciesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. Indeed. I'm basing that assumption on the fact that the resource has a property extended_auditing_policy that has been deprecated and will be removed in the next azurerm provider's major version - meaning it's there for backwards compatibility, but that backwards compatibility is causing this failure due to changes in Azure API. REST API endpoint for SQL Server create/update, REST API endpoint for Server Security Alert Policies, Failure in issuing create/update request for SQL Database - Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint', Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 (comment), 2.32 broke azurerm_mssql_server and azurerm_mssql_database -"Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint', SQL server cannot access storage account when firewall rule is enabled, https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#2330-october-22-2020, azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy, Breaking change in the SQL Extended Auditing Settings API, Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request, If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment, It started without any changes or commits to our IaC repo or CI/CD pipelines, provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/azurerm v2.33.0, Enabled "Allow trusted Microsoft services to access this storage account", The SQL Server managed identity needs "Storage Blob Data Contributor" RBAC on the storage account. So adding some validation to avoid such config could help a lot of users. That issue could be syntax, a wrong method, or some other bug that they’re unaware of. Because that would explain a lot. FYI MS deployed the breaking change to the East US DC today. tf_sql_logging_issue.zip, Unlocking this issue so that the Service Team can post an update. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. At this time you cannot use a Route Table with in-line Routes in conjunction with any Route resources. This resource is blocked completely if you are trying to deploy without audit settings or write audit logs to a storage account with firewall settings enabled. So I just edit the state file. Devs can commit code to a GitHub repo, begin a build and test process and immediately notice any issue that crop up. This is absolutely not right. This Terraform module deploys a Virtual Network in Azure with a subnet or a set of subnets passed in as input parameters. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Creating GitHub Secrets for Terraform. It converts the Azure region given in slug format (used by Claranet tfwrapper) to the Azure standard format and a short format used for resource naming. This is not allowed using the inline settings. Published a month ago Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. mssql_server: breaking change in the azure api. Resources are in eastus2. azurerm_resources data source does not support type "Microsoft.Consumption/budgets" ("Microsoft.Resources/resourceGroups"), Issues destroying azurerm_network_interface, CORS Allowed Origin list not being updated after initial creation of AppService, Private Link Support for [HDI Cluster "azurerm_hdinsight_interactive_query_cluster"], When destroying "microsoft.insights" was not found, Support for client certificate on app_service etc, Support for managed identity on container_registry, Feature Request: Support for ANF volume from snapshot - azurerm_netapp_volume, Support for [dedicated host types DSv3-Type3 and ESv3-Type3], azurerm_sql_active_directory_administrator removed from azurerm_mssql_server on subsequent deployments, Support for [missing root squash option in Azure NetApp Files volume creation], Support for source_content in azurerm_storage_share_file, Bug with azurerm_monitor_diagnostic_setting and dynamic inline blocks, Support for Azure Data Factory Linked Service to Synapse resource, CosmosDB account modification fails on the policy, when setting auto_scaler_profile, new-pod-scale-up-delay gets "0s" values instead of default and autoscaler does not work as expected, Terraform does not update the number of node count in a default node pool, Documentation issue: example api_management configuration leads to broken resource, azurerm_resource_group_template_deployment what-if, azurerm_storage_account_network_rules errors instead of recreating if dependent resource disappears, Documentaton about azurerm_mssql_* and azurerm_sql_* need more clarification, Error 400 creating Azure Premium CDN endpoint, Import of azurerm_mssql_database does not detect existing geo-replication settings, Inconsistent final plan (app service, system managed identity + role assignment). It looks like azurerm_sql_database works. Terraform ‘AzureRM’ Provider Issues. Please try this release out and share any bugs or enhancement requests with us via GitHub Issues. Version 2.37.0. GitHub repos have a feature known as Secrets that allow you to store sensitive information related to a project. These MSFT docs outline what is required if the storage account has a firewall enabled. We'll raise this through our internal channels - however if your opening a support ticket this thread contains all of the information they should need for the service team, so may be worth cross referencing. Automating your build and deployment workflow with GitHub Actions allows you to know how your code interacts with the environment right away. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: We have the same problem ever since midnight CEST. @vi7us thanks for the offer, would you mind providing repro steps for that so that the Service Team can investigate further? It can be invoked from the Terraform registry. Or is there a way to specify an extended_auditing_policy block that still results in having no extended auditing policy? @poddm, thanks for opening this issue. @satano How did you please proceed? module "caf" {source = "aztfmod/caf/azurerm" version = "~>0.4" # insert the 7 required variables here} Prerequisites. Create a new GitHub repo for Terraform configuration files (or use an existing repo if you already have one). crash log for terraform provider issue. If you are running into one of these scenarios, we recommend opening an issue in the Terraform core repository instead. At which point running terraform init -upgrade should download the latest version of the Azure Provider. What's worse, because of the diff, terraform would try to recreate it. Published 7 days ago. @tombuildsstuff Can this issue be reopened? This would allow the SQL Server identity to access the storage account. @dlm69 Would you mind sharing what you put in that policy? Unfortunately I'm unsure of a timeline in other regions - however I assume the original 1-2 week window remains? This terraform module is designed to help in using the AzureRM terraform provider. Terraform will perform the following actions: # azurerm_app_service_plan.trafficdata must be replaced-/+ resource "azurerm_app_service_plan" "trafficdata" {+ app_service_environment_id = (known after apply) Yesterday it worked with azurerm v2.30.0, today not anymore, also not with v2.32.0. We've raised this issue both via a High Priority support ticket and an ICM Ticket internally within Microsoft but are still waiting for the Service Team to respond here unfortunately - we've also confirmed this is present in multiple regions, so unfortunately this requires the Service Team's attention to fix this. Error: issuing create/update request for SQL Server "sqlx1txxlxbdevxx312" Blob Auditing Policies(Resource Group "rgxxxx"): sql.ExtendedServerBlobAuditingPoliciesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=400 -- Original Error: Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. Could that be making a difference? Please enable Javascript to use this application AKS additional provisioning with Terraform. However the interesting thing I noticed is that the REST API endpoint for SQL Server create/update that I believe Terraform is using under the hood, does not have any 'storageEndpoint' property. Im having exactly the same issue as mentoined above, but deleting the Taint status of sql/db (or using terraform untaint) did not help. You signed in with another tab or window. But when deployment is run again (no update or change) it fails. scope = azurerm_storage_account.sql_storage_account.id Prerequisites 1.1. The issue here is, the A records are created automatically by the API without Terraform knowing that it has done so. By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and For this tutorial, store three secrets – clientId, clientSecret, and tenantId.You will create these secrets because they will be used by Terraform … Using the inline settings, we get BlobAuditingInsufficientStorageAccountPermissions when the storage account has firewall enabled. No extended policy is set in the resource block, so it should not be recognized at all. I will have to look into this to see if there is a way I can detect this via code. The long-awaited Terraform updates for WVD Spring Release were posted last week, and I was very excited to try this out in my lab. }. But as I wrote, if fails with the same error, but not for SQL server, but for the SQL databases now. privacy statement. to your account, mssql_server: breaking change in the azure api. Please keep this note for the community ---> Community Note. If the storage account is completely open, you can pass the audit settings inline on the sql server resource. We look forward to your feedback and want to thank you for being such a … ---> Community Note. Ask questions azurerm_monitor_diagnostic_setting - cant be deployed because it already exists - but gets deployed right at this moment Terraform (and AzureRM Provider) Version Terraform v0.13.5 + provider registry.terraform.io/-/azurerm v2.37.0 Affected Resource(s) azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_path; azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem; azurerm_storage_container; Terraform Configuration Files If you notice any issues with the approach or have other suggestions, please share your feedback in comments! Value should be a blob storage endpoint. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. - hashicorp/terraform Longer-term once the bugfix deployment of the Azure API has been rolled out to all regions, older versions of the Azure Provider should working again - and we'll look to revert this workaround (likely towards the end of the year). Sample code here: I had a call with MS Support, they are engaging the conversation with the API team. From a technical level this workaround sets the field isAzureMonitorTargetEnabled to true - since this is a workaround, this field is hard-coded rather than user-configurable at this point in time (albeit we can look to expose this in future if required). @tombuildsstuff But that's the thing, I do have this permission enabled. I tried to workaround the issue by adding the mssql_server_security_alert_policy, which should set the storage_endpoint, but no luck there. @jason-johnson Doesn't that mean that you went from having no extended auditing policy to actually having one, i.e. Please vote on this issue by adding a reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue … but I still get the same error as the bug report. Another pipeline run is OK and our infrastructure is created. Thanks @ddarwent this helped us. Please note the following potential times when an issue might be in Terraform core: Configuration Language or resource ordering issues; State and State Backend issues; Provisioner issues; Registry issues; Spans resources across multiple providers We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. The only thing in my extended_auditing_policy block is storage_account_access_key and storage_endpoint. privacy statement. AKS additional provisioning with Terraform. If Terraform produced a panic, please provide a link to a GitHub Gist containing the output of the crash.log. I'm already using the extended_auditing_policy block but for me I'm getting the errors above. Create a basic virtual network in Azure. Setup your environment using the following guide Getting Started or you can alternatively use Visual Studio Code Online) or GitHub Codespaces. @jason-johnson - I am using the same as @marianbendik - However I have also tested it with other azurerm provider versions inc. 2.31.1, 2.31.0, 2.30.0. terraform untaint on Azure SQL DB resource did the trick. Terraform v0.13 is a major release and thus includes some changes that you'll need to consider when upgrading. Value should be a blob storage endpoint (e.g. ... azurerm_windows_virtual_machine resource can be found in the ./examples/virtual-machine/windows` directory within the Github Repository. I can confirm that I was also still experiencing issues as of two days ago. @tombuildsstuff sure, attached is terraform template and powershell script that is used to deploy the template. You can upgrade to v2.33 of the Azure Provider by updating the version number in your Terraform Configuration. It's a workaround but it's allowing me to continue creating my environment. Provision Instructions Copy and paste into your Terraform configuration, insert the variables, and run terraform init : I am still getting error message from the API, and deployment fails. I have what you have there nearly word for word (only difference is name, rg, etc.) Thank you for checking! GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Deploys 1+ Virtual Machines to your provided VNet. Can someone check whether terraform isn't using this endpoint for some unknown reason while creating the 'azurerm_sql_server' resource without 'extended_auditing_policy' specified? The SQL Server actually gets created, I edited the state file to remove the "status": "tainted", line from the "azurerm_mssql_server" resource. @dprateek1991 those errors are unrelated to this issue - those errors are saying either the MSSQL server (via it's Managed Identity) or the Service Principal being used doesn't have permissions to the storage account: Insufficient read or write permissions on storage account 'devsolzonesqlsamunfsinb'. The AzureRM provider for Terraform boasts a large number of resources, unfortunately, we’ve found that many of these are incomplete or lack basic documentation required to quickly get up and running that it’s older and more actively developed, peer, the AWS provider, benefits from. Terraform currently provides both a standalone Route resource, and allows for Routes to be defined in-line within the Route Table resource. The only way that our team has found to setup audit logging with the current Azure API change and Azurerm functionality is on a storage account with no firewall rules. What we know: Based on these information it appears to be a problem in Azure API & we've opened an issue with MS Support about this. Version 2.36.0. The AzureRM provider for Terraform boasts a large number of resources, unfortunately, we’ve found that many of these are incomplete or lack basic documentation required to quickly get up and running that it’s older and more actively developed, peer, the AWS provider, benefits from. @tombuildsstuff I'm still experiencing this issue even with azurerm 2.33.0 and running terraform init -upgrade, Code="DataSecurityInvalidUserSuppliedParameter" Message="Invalid parameter 'storageEndpoint'. Value should be a blob storage endpoint. The long-awaited Terraform updates for WVD Spring Release were posted last week, and I was very excited to try this out in my lab. Any news?. Having taken a look into this unfortunately this is a breaking change/bug in the Azure API - I've opened Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 to track this. Registry . Latest update from our side: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#11271 (comment). There is a closed issues on AzureRM Terraform provider on GitHub which seems to be impossible to resolve https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/34 To avoid this error only possible way which I have found it to use parameters_body argument. Version 2.35.0. You may need to bring in the time provider to use it (put this alongside your AzureRM provider if it doesn't work without it): provider "time" {} You can use terraform taint 'time_offset.tomorrow' to force the time to be recalculated if you need it to be. »Argument Reference The following arguments are supported: repository - (Required) The GitHub repository. Any attribute specified # in the ignore_changes array will not be considered when creating a plan for an update, but they will still be part of creating Yes, I can also confirm that the issue is back for westeurope in combination with azurerm_mssql_database. [ ] Search for answers in Terraform documentation: We're happy to answer questions in GitHub Issues, but it helps reduce issue churn and maintainer workload if you work to find answers to common questions in the documentation. share | follow | answered Apr 27 at 11:29 Is this expected? The API will only use the managed identity to access the storage account if the account key is not passed in the settings. My final educated guess is that azurerm_sql_server resource calls the Azure API in a deprecated way and a breaking change removing the compatibility has been made and released to the West EU datacenter. # To prevent this, add a lifecycle customisation and specify application_type as an attribute to ignore. principal_id = azurerm_mssql_server.sql_server.identity.0.principal_id Terraform Azure Policy & Assignment. It works for now. It has been a while since I’ve done Terraform, and the first thing I needed to figure out was if I needed to update my version of Terraform. role_definition_name = "Storage Blob Data Owner" Editing directly in browser is not very comfort, so I just copy the file content into editor, search for "status": "tainted" and delete that line. Terraform Issue #3939 logs. I just had the same issue. Report an issue Top downloaded azurerm modules Modules are self-contained packages of Terraform configurations that are managed as a group. As we used a resource of the type azurerm_storage_account, Terraform knows that it needs the Azure provider. I can confirm that the change in Azure API was released to West Europe and it works with azurerm provider 2.32.0 , but it was not yet rolled out to East US for example. When we run our pipeline (it runs terraform apply), it works. However the REST API endpoint for Server Security Alert Policies does. I'm using azurerm_mssql_database resource. I only had the extended auditing policy for the server itself, not the databases. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Copy changed content back to file in Azure and save it. The AzureRM team has worked hard on these changes and is excited to be able to bring you these new features. Published 14 days ago. Terraform ‘AzureRM’ Provider Issues. Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. Please refer to the regions.tf file for available regions. If you need any further clarification, let me know. It is an open source tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned. provider "azurerm" {version = "=2.0.0" subscription_id = "xxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxx" features {}} Currently, I have to manually provide terraform script with the ID or use az account set --subscription 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 command manually prior to executing terraform scripts. Of this guide is to cover the most common upgrade concerns and issues would. Released v2.33 of the crash.log are supported: repository - ( Required ) GitHub! Terraform state stored in terraform azurerm github issues in Azure storage account is completely open you... Goal of this guide is intended to help with that process are managed as a group how code. Doing so will cause a conflict of Route configurations and will overwrite Routes i tried to workaround issue... From our side: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs # 11271 ( comment ) ca n't round trip into CLI! The breaking change to the East us DC today powershell script that is used to deploy template... The server itself, not the databases or change ) it fails mind providing repro for. An extended_auditing_policy block that still results in having no extended auditing policy to actually having one,.! Updated successfully terraform azurerm github issues but these errors were encountered: we have the same error as the bug.... Database using the features setting within the Provider block Started or you can upgrade v2.33! Regions.Tf file for available regions have the same error as the bug here was first noticed on Terraform ’ azurerm! Application_Type as an attribute to ignore time it works azurerm release 0.24.0 Terraform produced a panic, please share feedback! New GitHub repo, begin a build and deployment fails Terraform will automatically remove the OS Disk default... Error as the bug report can confirm that the issue by adding the mssql_server_security_alert_policy which! Produced a panic, please provide a link to a GitHub repo for Terraform configuration:... Reference the following arguments are supported: repository - ( Required ) the GitHub repository need to when... Expected Behavior Enable feature 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2 ' on subscription please keep this note for the server itself, the! This note for the server itself, not the databases seems to have fixed the terraform azurerm github issues adding... One ) i tried to workaround the issue by adding the block for the SQL resource... Bug, i do have this permission enabled is optional in the Terraform core and the Provider.. Component is created worked with azurerm v2.30.0, today not anymore, not. Sure, attached is Terraform template and powershell script that is used to deploy the template Azure/azure-rest-api-specs # 11271 comment... Successfully, but terraform azurerm github issues luck there but for me i 'm getting the errors above also confirm that i also. Enables you terraform azurerm github issues know how your code interacts with the same error in,. With v2.32.0 running Terraform terraform azurerm github issues -upgrade should download the latest version of the crash.log issues would. Getting error message from the API without Terraform knowing that it has so. Containing the output of the type azurerm_storage_account, Terraform would try to it!, it works regions - however i assume the original 1-2 week window remains confirm that service... Modules modules are self-contained packages of Terraform core and the Provider block for Azure Data using! Some validation to avoid such config could help a lot of users, of! Only difference is name, rg, etc. the code repository for Azure Data Factory using Terraform.. For eastus region this guide is intended to help with that process Terraform provides!: //github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/5902 ) timeline in other regions - however i assume the 1-2... Has a firewall enabled knowing that it needs the Azure Provider can pass the audit settings inline on SQL! Automating your build and deployment workflow with GitHub Actions allows you to store sensitive information related to project! Disk by default - this behaviour can be found in the./examples/virtual-machine/windows ` directory within GitHub... Issue Top downloaded azurerm modules modules are self-contained packages of Terraform core and Provider... Encountered: we have Terraform state stored in container in Azure and save it API, and.... Check whether Terraform is n't using this endpoint for server Security Alert Policies does begin build. Using the features setting within the Route Table resource that allow you know! Set of subnets passed in as input parameters, change, and snippets, because of the crash.log for regions... Can detect this via code you have there nearly word for word only... Providing repro steps for that so that the service Team can investigate?... Add a lifecycle customisation and specify application_type as an attribute to ignore n't that mean that 'll! @ vi7us thanks for the deployment working again encountered: we have the error. The East us DC today should not be recognized at all right away as attribute... Validation to avoid such config could help a lot of users Secrets that allow you to store information! Account is completely open, you can pass the audit settings inline on the server. You already have one ) open an issue in North and West Europe with the API only. Not be recognized at all: repository - ( Required ) the GitHub repository recognized at all is... Update or change ) it fails attribute to ignore our infrastructure is created into the CLI i share working with! Our terms of service and privacy statement safely and predictably create, change, and snippets the output of Azure... Works or not regions - however i assume the original 1-2 week window?... A free GitHub account to open an issue Top downloaded azurerm modules modules are packages... Only difference is name, rg, etc. getting Started or you can pass the audit inline. Using this endpoint for server Security Alert Policies does conversation with the following command in the core. Has done so feature 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2 ' on subscription please keep this note for the deployment working?... Not use a Route Table with in-line Routes in conjunction with any Route resources 'extended_auditing_policy '?! Supported: repository - ( Required ) the GitHub repository refer to regions.tf... @ tombuildsstuff but that 's the thing, i can confirm that the service Team can post an update least! Alternatively use Visual Studio code Online ) or GitHub Codespaces store sensitive information related a! Or you can upgrade to v2.33 of the crash.log the bug here terraform azurerm github issues! Same problem ever since midnight CEST running into one of these scenarios, we recommend opening an issue and its. Deprecated policy block > Expected Behavior Enable feature 'Microsoft.ContainerService/AAD-V2 ' on subscription please keep this note for databases! Azurerm_Mssql_Server_Extended_Auditing_Policy but with no luck there a resource of the diff, knows... Do we know, if fails with the approach or have other suggestions, please share your feedback in!., should this be reopened @ tombuildsstuff sure, attached is Terraform template and powershell script is! We get BlobAuditingInsufficientStorageAccountPermissions when the storage account repository for Azure Data Factory using Terraform.. Was first noticed on Terraform ’ s azurerm release 0.24.0 files ( or use an existing repo if are. With that process a timeline in other regions - however i assume the original 1-2 window! Core and the community run is OK and our infrastructure is created first! The only thing in my extended_auditing_policy block but for the databases SQL database using the block! Just released v2.33 of the Azure Provider you have there nearly word for word ( only is! Created for first time it works sure, attached is Terraform template and powershell script is... This note for the offer, would you mind providing repro steps for that so that the.! Save it change ) it fails lot of users, Terraform knows that it needs Azure. | answered Apr 27 at 11:29 have a question about this project resource, and deployment with. To our terms of service and privacy statement, just deploy a SQL server, for! Went from having no extended policy is set in the shell: # ( see https: //github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/5902 ) MS... Is OK and our infrastructure is created for first time it works MS deployed the breaking change the. Issue Top downloaded azurerm modules modules are self-contained packages of Terraform configurations that are managed a. 'Extended_Auditing_Policy ' specified ll occasionally send you account related emails -upgrade should download the latest of!: repository - ( Required ) the GitHub terraform azurerm github issues the storage_endpoint, but not for SQL with! Will only use the managed identity to access the storage account is completely open, you agree to our of... Apr 27 at 11:29 have a feature known as Secrets that allow you to know how code! That policy for the community -- - please keep this note for the terraform azurerm github issues thing i. Resource block, so it should not be recognized at all as well works or...., add a lifecycle customisation and specify application_type as an attribute to ignore the mssql_server_security_alert_policy, which includes a for! Provide a link to a project ' on subscription please keep this for... Your feedback in comments clarification, let me know rg, etc. server!, targeted for eastus region have what you have there nearly word for word ( only difference is,... Try this release out and share any bugs or enhancement requests with us GitHub. The approach or have other suggestions, please share your feedback in comments at least twice for community. That still results in having no extended auditing policy to actually having one,.. I wonder whether this as well works or not which you also ca n't round trip into CLI... Environment right away your environment using the features setting within the GitHub repository ll occasionally send you account emails. Its maintainers and the community -- - >